pod2.0catch.com (the "new" pic, and some mirrors of video stills)
The Video and filters.... On several of these photos, i simply did an "autolevel" and "auto-contrast" in photoshop. On others, i "toned down" the non-color information. This process allows the photo to appear less "washed out", keeping the relavant information. I did NOT add a buldge or flash. These are still from a video. Though i can not personally verify the origin, it appears to be exactly the same video that was shown on 911, but a higher resolution than the networks provided.
About Missiles... I peronally have no idea, i have not researched this enough to give my opinion.
Do I think it should considered scientific proof of complicity? No, at least not at this point.
Do I think people should have the right to look into this if they like ? Of course. (by the way, they already do have the right to question, at least right now)
Is it possible it is a reflection of the sun, or other anomaly? Possible, yes, i would say so, but not likely. Several different videos show the same thing.
What is the Flash ? Not sure. I do not know much about the electronics in planes, though i DO know a good bit about Radios and antennas. I do not see a reason for something in the nose of this plane to be able to carry so much current. Generally, radios do not need much power. I have a hard time thinking it is a static charge as well. Think of the brid on a wire. Birds often sit on electrical wires without effect. If they were to be touched by a ground source, they would be fried though. The outer skin of the plane should not be at a different potential than ground. There would be no reason for it, and could cause problems if it were. What else could it be?
DGP: These planes were being piloted by remote control, probably an AWACs aircraft taking over that airplane or airplanes or drones, unmanned drones. And flying them at 5 and 8 G-force that no pilot could withstand. So, in short, and if you read books 2 and 3, you will discover how and why this came about. New news from the anomaly on flight 175 a new forum at Democratic Undergroundand page about www.amics21.com discussing previously unseen video (NEW?) of flight 175 just before hitting the tower. interestingly, the stills are on the this NIST .pdf link (appendixh.pdf) The new stills were done by Scott Myers who also did a review for Final Cut Pro , a program that just happens to be capable of making an overlay (like the "building") and running prepared frames behind it. it seems he was also a JFK researcher, who's specialty was making digital simulations (thanks to the Webfairy for this) www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html www.amics21.com/911/flight175/rebuttals.html Jack Blood review... After reviewing the video from www.letsroll911.org , JackBlood.com has analyzed the flash emitted by the tip of the ‘pod’ located below the airliner. Webmaster Mario Andrade, a Gulf War veteran an explosive ordinance specialist, has noticed remarkable similarities between the ‘pod’ and a military-type general purpose (GP) bomb, such as the commonly used Mark 84 (MK-84).
This site goes into detail showing the difference in the paint job, which should have shown a bright white stripe down the middle of the bottom of this plane (for a standard 767UA plane). all of the pictures that day seem to show something different. cloakanddagger.ca/media/Grossmann/081%209-11%20Tests.htm themedianews.com/DAGGER/Stefan/018%20DOSSIER%20UA175.htm (there is also a lot of great info about the Pentagon and the building collapses)
